- #PUREBASIC NEW GADGET COLOR MAC OS#
- #PUREBASIC NEW GADGET COLOR .EXE#
- #PUREBASIC NEW GADGET COLOR DRIVER#
- #PUREBASIC NEW GADGET COLOR CODE#
#PUREBASIC NEW GADGET COLOR .EXE#
PB compiling to platform-dependent binary format (EXE in Win) by platform-specified compiler version.
#PUREBASIC NEW GADGET COLOR MAC OS#
PB designed for Windows, Linux, Mac OS and Amiga OS development. Also, Delphi has long been used as malware creating tool - now few antiviruses suspects of Delphi EXEs in malware. But they are paid (and very expensive) and creating quite large EXEs. You should learn and write a much more to obtain the same result.ĭelphi and C++ Builder aren't so hard. #include #include #include #include // #pragma comment(lib, "user32.lib") - for MessageBox, required if lib not added in the compiler options Tool for this should be quick, native and simply.
And "temporary" soft writing for experiments with undocument libx, hacks, etc.And other soft requiring a performance and light weight.Adware and "legal adware" (with neccessary license agreement). Adware should eat a little CPU time, RAM and disk space and shouldn't require a third-party platform.
#PUREBASIC NEW GADGET COLOR DRIVER#
Driver just will not work if will require a. Also very undesirable to require a few third-party DLLs weighing a few MBs at all. Installer shouldn't require a third-party platform. Where native and third-party independent development is necessary? I just help you orient that language is best for your purposes. Really.Īlso I am not a spammer advertising a commercial product on CodeProject. I do not work for the authors of PB. And, PureBasic is bes t for most native purposes. You can use Delphi, a few C++ implementations, and a few more PLs. Python and Java is better for cross-platform development, not least because not compiling to platform-dependent executable format on many OSes.īut, if you want write native applications, not requiring a third-party dlls and platforms, or native and cross-platform applications, you can't use C#, Java, Python. C# is more convenient and powerful than PB for writing Windows applications. I don't think that PureBasic better than all of these PLs. I writing in more than 10 PLs including C#, Java, C++ and other main-stream PLs. You can change everything by hand, but primarily you don't have to do anything at all, it always fits.No. The text size is adjusted automatically, also the alignment and padding. The same with the Font Flags, you can specify them, but you don't have to. Yes and you don't need to load any fonts at all, if you want to use a special one, just enter its name.
The problems start with the automatic fitting of the text, text length and text size for multiline texts and continue with the fitting and alignment of the text.
#PUREBASIC NEW GADGET COLOR CODE#
Really good codes become very large and complicated to code very quickly The next days there will be a whole bag of new incredible text functions for and without gadgets.Ĭustom gadgets are often created canvas based.īut if you want the perfect look and feel of the OS, there is no way around ButtonImageGadgets.įor your problem just look for StretchText Gadget, or any other Several authors, as well as myself, develop new functions and add extensions for the GFX_Wizzard_BF. The first address for such things is the GFX_Wizzard_BF, which you can not deny. Well, of course it is not so easy to find something suitable, these things are often well hidden. Repeat : Until WaitWindowEvent()=#PB_Event_CloseWindow StopDrawing() : ok=ButtonImageGadget(gad,x,y,w,h,ImageID(text),flags) If font=#PB_Default : font=GetStockObject_(#DEFAULT_GUI_FONT) : EndIfĭrawText(w/2-TextWidth(text$)/2,h/2-TextHeight(text$)/2,text$,fgcolor,bgcolor) If fgcolor=#PB_Default : fgcolor=GetSysColor_(#COLOR_BTNFACE) : EndIf If bgcolor=#PB_Default : bgcolor=GetSysColor_(#COLOR_BTNFACE) : EndIf Code: Select all Procedure ButtonGadgetColor(gad,x,y,w,h,text$="",flags=0,fgcolor=#PB_Default,bgcolor=#PB_Default,font=#PB_Default)
0 kommentar(er)
